Can You Enter Canada With a Reckless Driving Conviction?

It depends on how your conviction maps to Canadian law. A criminal reckless driving conviction usually maps to dangerous operation under Criminal Code s.320.13, which has carried a 10-year maximum since December 18, 2018: serious criminality under IRPA s.36(1). A traffic infraction with no criminal record may create no inadmissibility. An officer decides.

See how a reckless driving statute maps to Canadian law with Criminal Equivalency

Last verified: November 2026

$1,231
IRCC’s Criminal Rehabilitation fee for serious criminality
$246.25
IRCC’s Temporary Resident Permit fee
Over a year
How long IRCC says rehabilitation applications can take

The Fee Calculator estimates government fees.

Is reckless driving treated like a DUI in Canadian law?

In Canada, there are two distinct driving offences relevant to inadmissibility analysis. Impaired operation (Criminal Code s.320.14) is operating a conveyance while impaired by alcohol or drugs. Dangerous operation (s.320.13(1)) is operating a conveyance in a manner that, having regard to all the circumstances, is dangerous to the public.

On indictment, both carry a 10-year maximum under s.320.19 for offences committed on or after December 18, 2018 (Bill C-46). Until that date the Criminal Code set a 5-year maximum for dangerous operation. Dangerous operation causing bodily harm (Criminal Code s.320.13(2)) carries up to 14 years on indictment under s.320.2.

Reckless driving and DUI compared for Canada
Feature	DUI (post-2018)	Reckless Driving (criminal statute)
CCC Equivalent	s.320.14 impaired operation	s.320.13 dangerous operation
Maximum Penalty	10 years (indictment)	10 years (indictment) since December 18, 2018; 5 years before
IRPA Tier	Generally serious (s.36(1))	Generally serious (s.36(1)), if maps to s.320.13
Deemed Rehab	No	No (if serious criminality)
CR Fee	$1,231 CAD	$1,231 CAD

If your reckless driving maps to a Canadian criminal equivalent with a 10-year maximum, it is generally treated as just as serious for IRPA purposes as a DUI. The name and the underlying conduct differ, but the inadmissibility tier can be identical. Whether your state statute actually reaches that threshold is an equivalency question, and the visa or border officer reviewing your case decides it.

Does a state reckless driving statute map to s.320.13?

Officers compare the foreign offence with Canadian law. They ask: if this offence had been committed in Canada, would it be an offence under an Act of Parliament, such as the Criminal Code? Not all US reckless driving convictions have a Canadian criminal equivalent.

Reckless driving under US state criminal statutes: if your state codes reckless driving as a misdemeanor or felony criminal offence involving operation of a vehicle in a manner dangerous to others, and it maps to CCC s.320.13 (dangerous operation: 10-year max), it is serious criminality under IRPA s.36(1). An officer decides the equivalency.
Reckless driving as a traffic infraction or civil violation: some states treat reckless driving as a traffic matter rather than a criminal conviction. If the offence does not produce a criminal record, it may not have a Canadian criminal equivalent and may not create inadmissibility. This varies by state and must be analyzed on its facts.

The Criminal Equivalency page shows how state reckless driving statutes map to Canadian law.

The rule

Operating a conveyance in a manner that, having regard to all the circumstances, is dangerous to the public.

Criminal Code s.320.13(1)Verify on justice.gc.ca

Does a wet reckless plea change the answer?

In many US states, a DUI charge can be plea-bargained down to "wet reckless", reckless driving involving alcohol. For Canadian admissibility, a "wet reckless" conviction requires the same analysis as standard reckless driving.

The analysis starts from the offence you were convicted of, not the original charge. If you were convicted of reckless driving (not DUI), the officer maps that conviction to a Canadian equivalent.
A wet reckless conviction that maps to CCC s.320.13 (dangerous operation), for an offence on or after December 18, 2018, is serious criminality under IRPA s.36(1), same as a standard DUI post-2018.
If your state’s wet reckless statute is characterized as a non-criminal traffic violation, the analysis may differ.

When can deemed rehabilitation apply?

Deemed rehabilitation (set out in IRPR s.18, under IRPA s.36(3)(c)) means enough time has passed that you may be considered rehabilitated without applying. An officer checks that the conditions are met. It can apply only where the offence is non-serious criminality, that is, where the equivalent Canadian provision carries a maximum of less than 10 years.

If your reckless driving maps to a Canadian dangerous operation equivalent with a 10-year maximum (the maximum for offences on or after December 18, 2018), it is serious criminality, and deemed rehabilitation does not apply.
For an offence before December 18, 2018, the Criminal Code maximum for dangerous operation was 5 years. IRCC says it judges an impaired driving offence from before that date on the penalties then in force, and an officer decides how an older dangerous driving conviction is classed.
An offence that matches only a provincial traffic offence is not an offence under an Act of Parliament, so IRPA s.36 does not list it.
One indictable-equivalent conviction takes the 10-year route under IRPR s.18(2)(a), counted from the completion of all sentence conditions.
Two or more convictions are not automatically disqualifying: IRPR s.18(2)(b) sets a separate 5-year class where every conviction would be a summary conviction offence in Canada.

What routes does the law give, and who decides?

Temporary Resident Permit (IRPA s.24(1)): A TRP may be issued to an inadmissible person where an officer is satisfied the need to enter or remain in Canada outweighs the risk. There is no minimum waiting period, but issuance is discretionary and not guaranteed. IRCC says a permit is no longer valid once you leave Canada, unless it states that it is valid for re-entry. You can apply in advance for planned travel, or request consideration at a port of entry.
Criminal Rehabilitation (IRPA s.36(3)(c)): Applied criminal rehabilitation is the application that, once approved, removes the grounds of criminal inadmissibility (IRCC guide 5312). You are eligible to apply 5 years after completing ALL parts of the sentence (custody, probation, fines, conditions). The government fee is $1,231 CAD for serious criminality, or $246.25 CAD for non-serious criminality. A later offence can create new inadmissibility.

Which free tool checks your own case?

Free, with no account. What you enter in a tool stays in your browser.

What do people ask?

Can you get into Canada with a reckless driving charge?

A pending charge is not a conviction, so the conviction paragraphs, IRPA s.36(1)(b) and s.36(2)(b), generally do not apply yet. An officer can still act under s.36(1)(c) or s.36(2)(c), which cover committing an act, on the lower "reasonable grounds to believe" standard of IRPA s.33. Bring the court records and answer honestly. The Pending Criminal Charges guide explains that route.

Can I enter Canada with a reckless driving conviction?

It depends on how your state's statute maps to Canadian law. If it maps to dangerous operation under Criminal Code s.320.13, with a 10-year maximum, it is serious criminality under IRPA s.36(1), and the routes the law gives are a TRP or Criminal Rehabilitation. If it was a non-criminal traffic matter, it may create no inadmissibility. An officer decides. The Criminal Equivalency page shows how offences map.

What is reckless driving under the Canadian Criminal Code?

The Criminal Code calls it dangerous operation: operating a conveyance "in a manner that, having regard to all the circumstances, is dangerous to the public" (s.320.13(1)). It has carried up to 10 years on indictment under s.320.19 since December 18, 2018, up from 5 years. Causing bodily harm (s.320.13(2)) carries up to 14 years, and causing death (s.320.13(3)) up to life. Careless driving under provincial traffic law is a separate matter. Criminal Code s.320.13 sets out the offence.

Is reckless driving treated the same as DUI when entering Canada?

Often, yes, in its result. Reckless driving that maps to s.320.13 (dangerous operation) and a DUI that maps to s.320.14 (impaired operation) both carry a 10-year maximum for offences on or after December 18, 2018, so both are serious criminality under IRPA s.36(1). The names and the conduct differ, but the IRPA tier is the same, and neither allows deemed rehabilitation. The DUI Entry Guide covers impaired driving in depth.

Will a wet reckless plea help me enter Canada?

Not necessarily. Canada looks at the offence you were convicted of and its Canadian equivalent, not the original DUI charge. If the wet reckless conviction maps to s.320.13 (dangerous operation), the IRPA result is the same as a DUI. If your state treats it as a non-criminal traffic violation, the analysis may differ. The Criminal Equivalency page shows how state statutes map, and an officer decides.

My reckless driving conviction is 12 years old. Can I use deemed rehabilitation?

Only if the Canadian maximum for the offence is under 10 years. Dangerous operation has carried 10 years since December 18, 2018, and before that date the maximum was 5 years. IRCC says it judges an impaired driving offence from before that date on the penalties then in force, and an officer decides how an older dangerous driving conviction is classed. With a maximum under 10 years, one offence can qualify once 10 years have passed since the whole sentence ended (IRPR s.18(2)(a)). The Criminal Rehabilitation page covers the applied route.

Can I be turned away at the border if my reckless driving was only a traffic ticket?

Possibly, but a genuine non-criminal traffic infraction that left no criminal record often has no Canadian criminal equivalent and, on its own, may not create criminal inadmissibility. The officer still reviews the actual record and decides how to classify it, and honesty in your answers still matters. Carry the statute and the court disposition. The Admissibility Explorer shows how IRPA s.36 reads.

Will a US pardon or expungement of my reckless driving conviction clear me for Canada?

Not automatically. Canada assesses admissibility under its own law. IRPA s.36(3)(b) refers to a final acquittal or a record suspension under Canada's Criminal Records Act, which is a Canadian mechanism. IRCC says a person pardoned for an offence outside Canada may still be inadmissible, and the visa office confirms whether a foreign pardon is valid in Canada. The Criminal Rehabilitation page explains the application, open 5 years after the sentence ended.

Part of:Criminal record

Official sources

This page is based on law and policy published by the Government of Canada.